Pages written in the language, not passed through a translator
Machine output reads as machine output, and a first time client choosing a studio in their second language notices immediately.
Reach the Spanish, Mandarin or Korean speaking clients in your catchment.
If you teach classes in a second language, that is a genuine product difference and almost nobody in your market is optimising for it. We build properly translated pages with correct hreflang, and we keep the class language separate from the front desk language, because they are not the same offer.

If somebody teaches yoga in Spanish in your neighborhood, there is a real audience searching for exactly that in exactly those words, and almost nobody has built the page. The English site does not surface for it. A machine translated copy of the English site surfaces badly and reads worse, which for a beginner deciding whether they will be understood is the whole decision.
Machine output reads as machine output, and a first time client choosing a studio in their second language notices immediately.
Staff who can help at the desk and a class actually taught in Spanish are two different promises. Blurring them produces a bad first visit.
So the right version is served and the two do not compete with each other in search. This is where most multilingual builds break.
These searches carry far less competition than the English equivalent, which is unusual in a market where every studio chases the same phrase.


Census data and search demand for your catchment, not a guess. Some neighborhoods carry a large second language audience and some do not, and we would rather find that out before you pay for pages.
Classes taught in the language, staff who speak it, and materials available in it are three separate claims. We write only the ones that are true.
Wellness vocabulary does not survive machine translation. Cues, contraindications and pricing terms are exactly where it fails.
Correct annotations so versions do not cannibalise each other, then traffic and bookings reported per language so you can see whether it earned its place.
From $500 per month
Starting range, not a quote
From $500 per month per language. Whether you need a handful of landing pages or the whole site translated is the main thing that moves it. Tell us how many locations you run and what software you are on and we will give you a real number.
If nobody on your team teaches in the language, do not build the pages. You will win the search, disappoint the visitor and collect a review that says so. Hire the teacher first.
It is worth stating, and it is not the same offer. We would write it as front desk support rather than as a Spanish language class, because somebody booking on the second promise and arriving to the first has a bad first visit and tells people about it.
You can, and the result usually reads as translated. For a beginner deciding whether they will be understood in a room full of strangers, that impression is the entire decision. Wellness vocabulary is also exactly where machine translation slips, particularly cues and contraindications.
Whichever one you can genuinely teach in, and after that whichever has real population and search demand in your catchment. We check the data before recommending, because the answer differs street by street.
Not with hreflang set correctly, which is precisely what most multilingual builds get wrong. Done properly the versions point at each other and search engines serve the right one.